'A Reel of Cranks': 'they returned what was theirs' — dismantling the argument (21.11.2021)

Date
21 November 2021
Duration
19:27
Platform
YouTube

A street video debate by Vitaliy Dribnytsya (the compilation “A Reel of Cranks”). Only the first conversation (00:12—07:13) is substantive for the article: the opponent defends the Soviet narrative that in September 1939 the USSR merely “returned what was its own” — the lands of Western Ukraine and Belarus. Dribnytsya dismantles it on the opponent’s own ground: territorially the “return” is false (of the Ukrainian lands, only Volhynia had been part of the Russian Empire, whereas Eastern Galicia was Austrian from 1772 to 1918), legally the USSR could not claim “imperial” lands (it was created in 1922, and the Bolsheviks refused to recognize themselves as successors of the empire), and the very principle “conquered, therefore returned what was ours” leads to absurdity (in which case Mongolia too is entitled to “return” Russia to itself). The rest of the video is repetition and abuse with no historical content.

Key moments

  1. 02:00 Opponent: the USSR 'returned what was its own' — Western Ukraine and Belarus, 'lost' in the Soviet-Polish war
  2. 02:19 Eastern Galicia never belonged to the Russian Empire — only Volhynia did; Galicia was Austrian
  3. 03:06 The USSR was created in 1922; the Bolsheviks renounced succession to the Russian Empire and its treaties
  4. 05:33 Reductio ad absurdum: if 'conquered = returned what was ours', then Mongolia too may 'return' Russia to itself

Topics from this source